The First Shock Is Rarely the Last

As of November 12, 2026

For most of 2026, the stock market was quiet. Through Wednesday, November 4, the S&P 500 had moved 2% or more in a single day only four times in 212 trading sessions. Then came Thursday. The index fell 4.4%, its largest one-day decline since April 2025 and its first drop of 4% or more in 399 trading days.

The shape of the week matters as much as its size. On Wednesday the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 1,569 points, or 3.0%, its best day since April 2025. On Thursday it gave back 1,833 points as investors reassessed how quickly artificial intelligence data centers can be built following the midterm election results. The Nasdaq-100 fell 6.4%, its worst day since March 2020. The PHLX Semiconductor Index, which tracks chip makers, lost 12.2%, the second-largest decline in a history that begins in 1994. The Cboe Volatility Index (VIX), which measures how much movement options traders expect from the S&P 500, jumped 70% in one session, the third-largest daily increase since 1990.

The rebound was nearly as abrupt. On Monday, November 9, the S&P 500 rose more than 2.3% and the Nasdaq-100 gained 3.4%, its best day since March. The semiconductor index recovered 6.9%. Before last Thursday, the S&P 500 had moved 2% or more four times all year. It has now done so twice in three sessions.

A Rare Day in an Unusual Setting

Declines of this size are uncommon. Since 1950, the S&P 500 has fallen 4% or more on 57 of roughly 19,300 trading days, about once every 340 sessions. They are not evenly spaced, though. More than half of them, 30 of the 57, occurred in just three years: 2008, 2009 and 2020. Most 4% days arrive when markets are already in turmoil.

Thursday was different. It came out of relative calm, which makes the better comparison the first 4% decline after at least three months without one. There have been 20 of those since 1950, and what followed them carries two distinct messages.

The Next Month Was Usually Uncomfortable

In 17 of the 20 episodes, the S&P 500 closed below its shock-day level at some point in the following month. The median episode saw the index fall a further 6.5% at its low. One month later, the index was higher only 9 times out of 20.

The ride was rough in both directions. In an ordinary month since 1950, the S&P 500 has produced about one move of 2% or more. In the month after a first shock, the median was more than five. Sixteen of the 20 episodes included at least one more decline of 2% or greater, and five included another drop of 4% or more.

The Next Quarter Usually Looked Better

Three months after the first shock, the index was higher in 18 of 20 cases, with a median gain of 6.4%. That is more than double the 2.7% median for all three-month periods since 1950. The two exceptions were 1987 and 2008, when the first shock turned out to be the opening act of a much larger decline.

The twelve-month picture is more mixed. The median gain of 14.3% was above the 10.7% median for all periods, but the index was higher in only 14 of 20 cases, slightly less often than the 75% rate for all twelve-month periods. Twenty episodes is a small sample. These are tendencies, not odds, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

The Best Days Live Next to the Worst Days

The reason reacting to a single day is so difficult shows up in the third exhibit. Of the 50 largest daily gains in the S&P 500 since 1950, 30 came within two weeks after one of the 50 largest declines. The third-largest gain of the period, 9.5% on April 9, 2025, arrived three trading days after a 6.0% drop. In the month following a first shock, 17 of the 20 episodes included at least one gain of 2% or more.

Large moves travel together. Historically, periods following sharp declines have also often included sharp advances, making the timing of market exits and reentries difficult.

What This Means for Portfolios

None of this predicts what the coming weeks will bring. What the record does suggest is a sensible set of expectations. Volatility that arrives suddenly has tended to linger for weeks. A lower low after the first shock has been the norm, not a sign that something has gone newly wrong. And the three-month record has been considerably better than the one-month record, although the exceptions were severe.

Historically, investors and institutions often establish portfolio management disciplines, such as rebalancing policies, defined risk budgets, or rules-based processes, before periods of heightened volatility. The first shock is rarely the last. Many investors find it helpful to establish a plan before periods of market volatility rather than during them.

Document ID: XT4604282808

Xtollo Investment Partners, LLC (“XIP”) is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. XIP, Portfolio Solutions (“XPS”), a DBA of Kensington Asset Management (“KAM”) and The Leuthold Group (“Leuthold”) are affiliated entities under common ownership. Advisory services are provided KAM (XPS). XIP promotes KAM and Leuthold strategies and funds and receives compensation for these activities, which creates a conflict of interest. Current Form ADV Part 2A (Firm Brochure) for both KAM (XPS) and Leuthold are available upon request and through the SEC’s IAPD at adviserinfo.sec.gov.

Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. No strategy, including diversification, ensures a profit or prevents loss.

Any indices and other financial benchmarks shown are provided for illustrative purposes only, are unmanaged, reflect reinvestment of income and dividends and do not reflect the impact of advisory fees. Investors cannot invest directly in an index. Comparisons to indexes have limitations because indexes have volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from a particular strategy such as the types of securities being substantially different.

This material is for informational purposes only and is not individualized investment advice or an offer to buy or sell any security. Information presented may not reflect current views due to changing market conditions.

Our materials may contain information deemed to be correct and appropriate at a given time but may not reflect our current views or opinions due to changing market conditions. No information provided should be viewed as or used as a substitute for individualized investment advice. An investor should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses of the investment and the strategy carefully before investing.

KAM (XPS) relies on third party sources for some of its information that we believe is reliable. However, we make no representation, warranty, endorse or affirm as to its accuracy or completeness. The information provided is current as of the date of publication and may be subject to change. We are not responsible for updating this information to reflect any subsequent developments or events.

Certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking statements,” which can be identified using forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” or “believe,” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events, results, or actual performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. Nothing contained herein may be relied upon as a guarantee, promise, assurance, or a representation as to the future.